XingfenD dd5d0fabf9 docs: book P15-A as delivered (wrapper 0.3.8, ROADMAP rows + third-wave table)
P15-A merged to crearte-server master as e70e99b (0.19.0, merge-base fe810dd,
eight commits on the branch). Both review rounds came back with notes and both
caught the controller's own verification method rather than the refactor: the
gofmt gate in the shared four-gate recipe was exit-code blind, and identifier
counting cannot prove behaviour is unchanged (whole files rather than function
bodies, a hand-picked list read as a universal claim, and no visibility into
control flow at all).

The branch review's most valuable contribution was an evidence layer all four
earlier runs had silently skipped: the five real-database guards the spec names
were SKIPPED everywhere because nobody set TEST_DATABASE_URL, and the ~11s
internal/api timing reported as "including real-database integration" was the
mock path. Running postgres against both trees gave base 194 PASS versus HEAD
199 PASS with identical state multisets - the first runtime proof of unchanged
behaviour on the production database path.

Five of its notes concerned controller artefacts, not code. Four were spec
staleness introduced during re-pin, every one from writing executable details
from memory instead of grepping them out of the code; the fifth was the
fake-rigour form of the vacuous-assertion defect this project keeps finding - a
verification script printing nineteen [OK] lines with no checking logic behind
them while citing an output file that was never archived. Both are now fixed in
37a0a8d and 9061c39, and the lesson is a spec discipline: executable details in
a spec must be grepped from the code entity and pasted, never hand-written.

ROADMAP also gains a correction of my own omission: P15-A and P15-B were
registered in the document index but never added to the third-wave status
table, which still ended at P14.

P15-B is deliberately excluded from this entry. Its branch review returned
"needs fixing before merge" - the second time a branch review has blocked a
batch after P11 - on a critical gap in the guard layer: maskSourceComments()
compares a two-character slice against the four-character '<!--', so its HTML
comment branch is dead code. A second fix-forward is in flight; P15-B books as
0.3.9 when it merges.
2026-10-04 02:42:03 +08:00
S
Description
No description provided
1.2 MiB
Languages
Shell 100%